Friday, March 22, 2013


HPRP

I have been pretty busy lately with what appears to be a new, more aggressive, unreasonable HPRP Program.  A number of clients have come to me for help and protection from HPRP.   HPRP seems to be demanding extensions of existing contracts several months before they are due to expire.  The demands often are instigated by the slightest causation.  The worse part of it is, in my opinion HPRP is a very dictatorial, aggressive and unreasonable toward its own patients. 
What a lot of health professionals don’t know is that HPRP is a for-profit corporation and I would emphasize the for-profit aspect.  There seems to be some misinformation extant that HPRP services are provided free or that it is some sort of benevolent, charitable organization.  That’s far from the truth.  Participation in the HPRP program is quite expensive and demanding.  If the health professional is unable to pay for services they are deemed to be in breach of contract and they are then threatened that they will be turned over to the State and lose their license to practice.
The threat of taking away a professional’s license because they don’t have money to pay for services is a heavy and frightening hammer indeed.  When an organization has that kind of power, it is up to the State of Michigan, health professionals and lawyers to stand up to the organization to ensure that such power is not abused.  No truer words were spoken when it was said that “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely”.

Kickbacks

Another very active area in healthcare law is criminal and civil cases involving kickbacks.  With the announcement of scores of kickback indictments in the Eastern District Federal Courts in Michigan it appears there will be a shortage of qualified attorneys to represent them!  The wave of kickbacks in the Eastern District I predict is crested and the Federal authorities will transfer interest to the Western side of Michigan.   And the difference will be that instead of indicting pharmacies, pharmacists, doctors, physical therapists, home healthcare providers, etc. located in urban areas, the focus in the Western half of the state will be on rural providers.
If you are a healthcare provider and are involved in a kickback situation it might be in your interest to contact me rather than wait for the hammer to descend.  Things can be done to mitigate situations.
Additionally, if you are approached by healthcare providers offering disguised kickbacks, please call me.  There are some healthcare providers that might be licensed to be a physical therapist or own a home healthcare agency, etc. but in reality they are criminals who just happen to be operating in the healthcare field. 
Some of these criminals are extremely effective in persuading physician’s assistants, nurse practitioners and doctors that their payment for being a “consultant” or “board of director” in an ACO is not a kickback but a lawful way of getting around anti-kickback statutes.  Don’t think they are so clever, or worse delude yourself into believing that this seemingly free money is a loophole that this genius has been the only one to figure out.
The truth is, if this healthcare provider is kicking back money to you and claiming that this is payment for “mileage reimbursement” or for your purported work as a consultant or board of director, there will come a time when federal law enforcement will challenge you to prove that you put the hours in, did the work and drove the miles.  Don’t think the feds are foolish.  They have vast computer surveillance “data mining” and they are very sophisticated and have seen and heard about every bogus scheme that the local genius can come up with.
If you are running an honest healthcare practice, then you should be concerned about the criminals paying kickbacks.  How can you compete and keep your professional practice thriving when someone else is cheating by paying kickbacks to doctors or other prescribers, etc.?  You will lose income to the cheating criminal every time.  In fact, one tip-off that kickbacks are occurring is when you see a too rapid rise of a particular chain of pharmacies, radiologists, doctor groups, etc.
Who are some new healthcare providers that are in the federal cross hairs now?  Cardiologists doing unnecessary surgical interventions, psychotherapist, and physician’s assistants.  Physician’s assistants unfortunately are easy to rope in to disguised kickback schemes because they often don’t have an attorney who could steer them away from criminal schemes.
In conclusion, when you are approached by somebody claiming that they have a new loophole to avoid income taxes or to pay you for referring healthcare business to them, be realistic.  Give me a call and let’s talk about their proposal.  The odds are the bonus payment or scheme is likely just another disguised kickback that will ruin your life and practice.  You may prosper for a while but in the end a big hammer is coming and you will regret any involvement.

Thursday, December 13, 2012

My Pharmacy Law CE

Here is the official flyer for a live CE lecture I will be teaching this January 9, 2013:


Thursday, November 08, 2012

Community Pharmacies Allowed to Compete on Fair Ground


Wouldn’t you like this law in Michigan?  Pennsylvania has a new law that allows community pharmacies to match the terms and conditions that large PBM’s and mail order pharmacies use to lure customers away. This allows consumers the freedom of choice to use local community pharmacies or mail order and, of course allows community pharmacies to compete on a more level playing field.

Wednesday, November 07, 2012

January Pharmacy Law Seminar

Many of you have inquired about the Pharmacy Law CE class that I am teaching on January 8, 2013 at the Fisher Auditorium at St. John Providence Hospital, 16001 W. 9 Mile Road, Southfield, Michigan 48073.  The registration commences at 6:30 p.m. and the program commences at 7:00 p.m. and you will receive 1.0 C.E. hour. 
The sponsoring organizations, the Oakland County and Wayne Country Pharmacists Associations, are doing this at a nominal charge.  As I understand it if you are not a member of the MPA they request that you donate $10.00.  The fee is waived for students in a College of Pharmacy. 
You can contact Dale Tucker, RPh Med, BCPS Chair Program Committee OCPA dtucker@dmc.org  for pre-registration.
I am teaching this class to help pharmacists and I don’t receive any revenue from ticket sales.  However, I would appreciate a good turnout simply because I am putting a great deal of effort into this class and I would feel good if a lot of people attend.  I hope I see you there.

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

THE PENCAK REPORT


Newsletter by E-mail
The Pencak Report is now available by e-mail.  Please forward your name & e-mail address to pencakreport@hotmail.com.


Communication
It’s been awhile since I’ve mailed out a Pencak Report, but it is time.  If you haven’t been to my website, www.pharmacylawpro.com you have probably been missing out on a lot of blogs.  I encourage you to visit the website because I am able to blog more frequently than mail the paper newsletter.  This Pencak Report is unique because it is dedicated to a central idea…communication.
It is no secret that the profession of pharmacy is rapidly changing.  Robots manipulate the physical dispensing of medication and pharmacists use monitors to remotely view prescriptions.  My personal research suggests that within a decade there will be a partial elimination of drugs themselves.  Yes, less tablets, capsules, injections, etc. 
Right now we use insulin for example, to augment a diabetic’s own endogenous secretions of insulin.  In other instances, we take psychotropic medications to chemically modulate neurotransmitters such as serotonin, etc.  The next step is to directly influence the brain and organs such as the heart or pancreas, by using direct electrical or radio wave stimulation.  I began to research this concept after a discussion with a client/pharmacist who had a Spinal Cord Stimulation System (SCS) implanted to electronically block pain messages from reaching his brain.  He was using opiates to relieve unremitting pain.  As you know opiate analgesics are believed to bind with specific receptors found mainly in the CNS.  He told me that the electronic interference was as effective to him as the opiates were.  The larger point is that pain is only one condition that is treatable electronically.  If you ponder the implications you will soon think of other organs and conditions that could be electronically stimulated or suppressed.  The CNS is a bioelectric system, yes?
If and when, electronics, stem cell manipulation and nanotechnology become common, what is the role of a pharmacist then?  Pharmacists will survive by what they do now that they don’t consciously realize.  Pharmacists communicate for a living.
This entire issue on communication has been inspired by my clients and other learned people I have come across by virtue of representing health professionals.  If you are not mentioned directly by name don’t take that as meaning you are not also a master communicator, it’s just that some of the names I will mention are more illustrative or appropriate for this particular newsletter. 

Community Pharmacy Level
When I think about pharmacists as excellent communicators to their patients and as a result are worth their weight in platinum to their employer, pharmacist Mark Kirsch comes to mind.  I have known a lot of pharmacists that are loved by their patients, but Mark Kirsch inspires such patient loyalty that they consistently travel with him to new employers.  Mark’s power is his genuine and sincere desire to help patients in an ethical fashion.  Helping a patient in an ethical manner does not mean simply saying “yes” to all requests from a patient.  Sometimes you have to say “no” to a patient’s request but the patient can still love and respect you.  The late comedian/actor George Burns once said something like “acting is about sincerity and when you can learn to fake that, you’ve got it made”.  Mark does not fake sincerity, he is sincere and all his patients love and trust him for it.

Authoritative Persuasion
As many of you know I have been very active and successful in helping all types of health professionals who have substance abuse or mental health issues to restore their license to practice or avoid criminal prosecution and other issues of that nature.  Generally, as a lawyer I will need a persuasive, credible and scientific report from a highly qualified addictionist or psychiatrist.  The readers of the reports are judges, administrative law judges, asst. atty. generals and other highly sophisticated legal professionals who have read thousands of reports in their careers.  My edge is that I only submit reports authored by extremely well credentialed, authentic, scientific experts.  Over the decades, one health professional comes to mind as the most persuasive communicator, and that is Dr. Bruce Baker, an addictionist with West Brook Recovery Center in Grand Rapids.
When I read reports from some experts or treating physicians the quality of the report is not persuasive.  Either the report lacks scientific rigor or the writer does not come off as genuine and authentic.  In contrast, Dr. Baker’s opinions are credible because they derive from rigorous scientific methodology communicated in a clear, unambiguous writing style.

Community Pharmacists Educating Society
Many pharmacists complain privately that American children are being overmedicated with potent psychotropic medications and the side effects frighten them and me.  I have spoken to community pharmacists everywhere and they tell me horror stories of kindergartners receiving extremely potent psychotropics because schoolteachers and some doctors find it much more lucrative and easy to urge parents to overmedicate their children with dangerous drugs than to take the time to understand and patiently correct a child’s behavior.  Here is where pharmacists should be speaking out publically as experts. 
One of my clients, pharmacist Frank Granett has spoken publically with his book “Over Medicating Our Youth” informing fellow pharmacists and childcare givers about the dangers of the drugs that are being forced upon children.  I would like to see more pharmacists speaking out publically about dangers and benefits of medications.  This is an opportunity for community and hospital pharmacists to communicate to society about subject matters they are expert in.  And the public benefits because the pharmacist is objective and knowledgeable.

Michigan Nurses Association (MNA)
Many of you know my wife is an R.N. and she keeps me updated on the Michigan Nurses Association (MNA) website and activities.  I am impressed with the MNA.  The MNA takes strong stands on behalf of nurses and their working conditions and it communicates to the public when politicians, hospitals and insurance companies endanger patients by conduct motivated by greed.  The MNA identifies Michigan politicians who act against the interests of patients and the nurses go door-to-door informing voters.

Health Professionals Educating the Public

“It’s easy to climb the ladder of success when
your father owns the ladder.”  Anonymous

Health professionals seldom contribute their expertise to the public arena.  Their absence from the media concedes the arena to charlatans who are paid to disinform the public.
For example, you might want to make yourself available to local and national television, radio, etc., to discuss whether or not Provigil® is safe and effective for “an executive seeking an edge at work.”  Yes, this is a white-collar version of the “performance-enhancing drugs” made infamous by Lance Armstrong.  I was shocked by a TV “news” story that even claimed there were “no side effects”!
And for example, if nurses and pharmacists do not educate citizens when sociopathic CEOs put lives at risk in the pursuit of bigger bonuses, who will?  In my opinion, all health professionals need to inform the public-at-large that for-profit health insurance companies are the problem and not the solution.  Not only do for-profit health insurers drive up the cost of health insurance because of the unnecessary, overpaid middlemen but additionally, they encourage waste, fraud and denial of necessary medical care.  If you cut provider reimbursement excessively, how will some try to survive?  The public will not hear this kind of opinion if health professionals don’t tell them. 
The public assumes you make three times the money as you actually do.  The public knows that you deserve to be well paid because you make a substantial contribution to bettering their lives; you add value to our society.
The public is now more aware that CEOs of private health insurers are vastly overpaid.  But the public is unaware that today’s doctors, pharmacists and nurses are vastly underpaid. I wonder whether it is time to let the public know the truth.
While one CEO of a health insurer gets a half billion dollars ($500,000,000) in a one year bonus for denying coverage, cutting pharmacy dispensing fees to nearly nothing and paying doctors too little money for a patient visit, the health professionals who actually heal the sick are seeing their own lifestyles and income erode severely.  I submit, I can find a person qualified to ruthlessly cut business expenses without remorse, much more easily than a person capable of transplanting a heart or kidney.  If you make the commitment to become a health professional you should enjoy the benefits in a just society.  Not so long ago, doctors and nurses rose through the ranks to become executives in hospitals.  They experienced caring for the sick and dying.  Today, you can start as a hospital executive without ever touching a patient.

Me Communicating With You
On one level, I make sense of the complexity of pharmacy regulation to my clients.  On another level, I communicate to prosecutors, judges and jurors what it is that pharmacists, doctors and nurses actually do for a living and how unclear the laws governing their practice are.  This year I have and will be doing a lot more communicating to groups of health professionals on the subject of pharmacy law.  I just taught a day-long seminar to health professionals who treat attorneys and judges with substance abuse problems.  (JLAP, sort of like HPRP)  This seminar was 75% pharmacology and 25% distinguishing between treating judges and lawyers vs. doctors and pharmacists.  Yes, I spent quality time with Goodman & Gilman’s.
On the evening of January 8, 2013, I will be doing a CE lecture entitled “Pharmacy Law for the Practicing Pharmacist” jointly sponsored by the Oakland and Wayne County Pharmacists Associations. It will take place at the Fisher Auditorium at St. John/Providence Hospital, 16001 W. 9 Mile Rd., Southfield, Michigan. I look forward to meeting some of you in person. I hope to do some lectures at our colleges of pharmacy in Michigan and elsewhere.

Pharmacists Communicating With Me
Please take the time to send me a succinct e-mail outlining your best practices for the detection of fake, forged or fraudulent prescriptions.  I will be adding the best of your knowledge to what I know so that my lectures and articles will be state of the art.   I know that some of you are going to astonish me with some of your ideas and I will likely be thinking to myself as I’m reading your email… “I wonder why I didn’t think of that?”  I can’t wait to read your ideas.

Books I Like
I have always loved books. Here are some on a variety of subjects. 
  • Who Stole the American Dream by Michael Matthews.  The title says it all but you will be surprised how he traces the key events back to 1971. 
  • The Price of Inequality by Joseph Stiglitz.  Current American history, economics and social implications of our extreme wealth disparity.  
  • Empire of the Summer Moon by S.C. Gwynne.  Early American history should be mandatory reading for all high school students.
  • Tracking and the Art of Seeing, 2nd Ed by Paul Rezendes.  All North American mammals, their signs, tracks, habits—you will be surprised at what lives in even small suburban wood lots near you. 
  • Bushcraft by Mors Kochanski.   This book teaches skills that once were common to our great-grandfathers/mothers but are lost today.  Things you can actually use such as how to properly sharpen knives, safely pruning or even felling trees in your own yard without killing yourself or damaging property or starting a fire with one match in a rainstorm, etc.  I used these skills recently when I spent a week in a tent in a remote region in far northern Saskatchewan.  If you go to a truly remote area do not trust that your outfitter is competent or that promised vital gear and food will be provided.  Expect that they will be incompetent and be prepared to do things for yourself.  
  • Modern Streamers for Trophy Trout by Bob Linsenman.  Trophy trout in Michigan’s streams and rivers are primarily nocturnal feeders.  However, we fish most often during the daytime.  Where are those giant trout during the daytime?  Those trout are not where you assume a big trout would always be.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Practical Philosophy


I meet a lot of people who come into my office afraid, sleepless and unhappy because of their legal problems.  Those new or repeat clients frequently leave in a much better state of mind.  Many of the clients say that they “feel relieved”, “at peace” or “calmer” after meeting with me for legal counsel.  I often spend as much time on the client’s overall well-being as I do gathering information to address the technicalities of their legal problem.  If my client is facing a hearing or an important conference, they need to be able to sleep, be confident and healthy to maintain their professional practice, family and focus in order to present themselves as they truly are. 

A client who is fatigued from lack of sleep and worry may not be perceived as truthful and competent.  So with that in mind, I want to share some practical philosophy that I think you may find worthy of consideration.  If it is, perhaps you might suggest my blog to a colleague or friend for their thoughts.

Over the years I have seen repeated examples of my belief that the way you think about the world and yourself can have a huge effect on the reality of your day-to-day life as well as your future.

Just as you can make yourself ill through thoughts and beliefs, you can do the opposite.  How can you really change an ingrained belief?  By convincing yourself of a new possibility with indisputable facts that lead to an irrefutable fact.

Abraham Lincoln fought depression his entire life.  Abe Lincoln once said something to the effect of… “I’ve come to the conclusion that a person is about as happy as he makes his mind up to be.”

Dogma is defined as a viewpoint or system of ideas based upon insufficiently examined premises.  Eckhart Tolle wrote this about dogmas:

Dogmas—religious, political, scientific—arise out of the erroneous belief that thought can encapsulate reality or the truth.  Dogmas are collective conceptual prisons.  And the strange thing is that people love their prison cells because they give them a sense of security and a false sense of “I know.”

Nothing has inflicted more suffering on humanity than its dogmas.  It is true that every dogma crumbles sooner or later, because reality will eventually disclose its falseness; however, unless the basic delusion of it is seen for what it is, it will be replaced by others.

What is this basic delusion?  Identification with thought.

An excellent example of dogmatism making scientists look foolish was in the late 19th century where many physicists dogmatically believed that all that could be known about physics was encapsulated within Newtonian physics.  Of course, along came Einstein and Neils Bohr who shredded that Newtonian dogmatism.  In medicine it was the dogmatic view that stomach ulcers were a result of lifestyle.  An obscure doctor in Australia after years of dedication, proved to the world at large that H. pylori was a bacteria that caused gastric ulcers and such ulcers could be treated with antibiotics.

Today, I hear and read entirely too many dogmatic opinions and statements.  There is very little creativity and innovation.  In fact, some people vilify intellectuals and intellectualism as though that were a fault.  We need a lot more intellectualism and a lot less dogmatism.

A concluding but important tenet that is found in all sound philosophies and religions is that every person should be grateful for what they have and not obsess on things they do not have.  If you stop from time to time and take a mental inventory of what you do have and be truly grateful for it, you won’t fall prey to a negative outlook.

Friday, June 22, 2012

Teaching Pharmacy Law and Declining MPJE Pass Rates


The Wayne County Pharmacist Association (WCPA) presented a four-hour class plus lunch, to recent graduate pharmacists from all Michigan Colleges of Pharmacy and elsewhere, to prepare them to pass the MPJE—a test of relevant federal and Michigan pharmacy law. 

I taught that class on Saturday, June 2, 2012.  I am honored that the WCPA asked me.  Yes, I actually talked for at least three hours and the amount of information to be covered was such, that three hours of talking went by rapidly for me. 

Preparing to teach this course, I examined an April 16, 2012 table on the NABP website that covers the MPJE passing rates for first time candidates by Colleges of Pharmacy, from 2007 through 2011.  Ferris State, U of M and Wayne State University show a decline in the passing rate.   I have also noticed that practicing pharmacists, who have been out of the university for some period of time, could benefit greatly from more effective teaching on the subject of pharmacy law.

Obviously, if a pharmacist does not know what the law is, that pharmacist may unintentionally fail to comply with it.  Further, pharmacy law is not a stationary target but a moving one.  Laws change frequently and there are always new ones.  Articles on the internet and continuing education courses exacerbate the problem by confusing and frightening pharmacists with proposed laws and the author’s misunderstanding of the laws and cases that they purport to be qualified to opine on.  Journal articles are written poorly from a grammatical and clarity standpoint.  If you are going to paraphrase a law for students, make it understandable, certain and clear.  Poor writing skills leave readers bewildered and frustrated.  If you are unable to present a statute, regulation or common law (case law or “judge-made law”) clearly and simply, you are not an expert. 

Do not equate a photographic memory of rules and regulations to be the same as understanding and applying them.  It is unnecessary for a pharmacist to be able to recite from memory those provisions of the pharmacy law that he or she does not deal with on a frequent basis because that pharmacist can read those regulations when they become an issue.  You must however know they exist.  That is why pharmacies are required to keep current copies of the Statutes and Rules on the premises

Regarding the MPJE and the Decline in First Time Passing Rate

Based upon my interaction with the pharmacy students at the MPJE preparation, the pharmacy students of today are every bit as intelligent, motivated and capable as any who came before them.  I would rule out the students themselves as a factor in the decline. 

There are at least three other areas to examine in regard to the decrease in the pass/fail rate on the MPJE: 

1.      Can the method, procedure and content of pharmacy law classes at our colleges of pharmacy be improved?  All respect and deference must be given to our three excellent colleges of pharmacy, their deans, their professors, and in particular, their pharmacy law professors.  That said, virtually anything can be improved and I have a unique perspective by virtue of being a pharmacist and attorney who has decades of experience in the trenches in every venue where pharmacy and law intersect.  Many pharmacist clients have rightly acknowledged that there is a substantial difference between the practice of pharmacy and the collegiate perspective.  
There is a huge difference between being the trial attorney for a pharmacist in a criminal case involving allegations of diversion of narcotics through illegitimate prescriptions and, reading a synopsis of the results of that trial to a classroom.  Please note that this writer is in no way criticizing any professor but just pointing out some crucial distinctions.

2.     Is the present MPJE the best tool for assessing an applicant’s competence in the core areas of pharmacy law that practicing pharmacists require?  Have suppositions surrounding CAT and the questions been proven by disinterested experts?

3.     Are there simply too many laws and too much complexity in the vast world of pharmacy law?  Yes and the problems will only get worse.  I have some innovative ideas for efficiently learning, organizing and applying pharmacy laws.

Helping Practicing Pharmacists Learn the Law

The problem of effectively learning pharmacy law is not limited to students in the university.  Perhaps the greatest need is found in actively practicing pharmacists. 

The Board of Pharmacy currently requires one hour of CE units (of the 30) to be in the area of pain control.  That is a good thing but couldn’t there be at least one if not two hours devoted to pharmacy law continuing education?  I am a pharmacist and I do my continuing education.  Pharmacology and disease states are well covered and readily available in live and written CE’s.  In my opinion, the pharmacy law CE’s are poorly presented to practicing pharmacists.  I must state that it is painful for me to read some pharmacy law articles in journals, online, etc., the material is poorly written and raise more questions than the materials solve.  Sometimes the authors are quite simply wrong about the law.  The author relies upon secondary or even tertiary law sources instead of primary ones.  That means they are relying upon the person who did an abstract or synopsis of a statute or case law and if that person drew the wrong conclusions then the person scanning that abstract will be even more misinformed.

That brings us to an important question, who should present pharmacy law to pharmacists and pharmacy students?  What that should that person’s qualifications be? 

I attended a live continuing education seminar for my own pharmacy CE credit requirement that incorporated an MD from another state, whose practice is devoted to treatment of pain.  This physician opined from her research of law on the internet, that if a pharmacist calls on the telephone and verifies with a pain control specialist that the prescription was written for this patient and that is what the doctor intends, that the pharmacist is free to dispense those opioids without fear of further accountability to the Board of Pharmacy or the DEA.  If any of the practicing pharmacists in the audience followed that advice literally, it would not be very long before they would be calling me to defend them in an action by the DEA and Michigan Board of Pharmacy.  This physician was in my judgment learned and skilled in her profession but should reserve her opinion to her specialty.

After these experiences, I have been inspired to want to inject my perspective of pharmacy law into the university courses and continuing education for pharmacists – if the universities and practicing pharmacists want me.  A soldier who fights and thrives in deadly combat has valuable insights for soldiers headed to first-time combat that cannot be found in books. 

Conclusion

I am not saying that pharmacy law should only be taught by a person who is a pharmacist and an attorney.  It takes more than that to teach and inspire.  It takes expert knowledge and actual experience combined with excellent communication skills and respectful rapport with students.

Friday, June 15, 2012

Remember this...?


Some pharmacy computer systems check a prescriber’s DEA number. Do you remember how to do it by hand?

Ø  The DEA number always has nine characters: the first two are letters followed by seven numbers.
Ø  The first letter is always A, B, F, M or X. (F was added when all possible numbers starting with A or B were assigned.) DEA numbers starting with X are assigned to prescribers with a Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) waiver. DEA numbers starting with M are assigned to mid-level practitioners.
Ø  The second letter is the first letter of the prescriber’s last name (unless the prescriber married and changed their last name).
Ø  Verify that a DEA number is authentic by:
a)     Adding the first, third and fifth digits together;
b)     Then add the second, fourth and sixth digits together and multiply this sum by 2;
c)      Add the results of a and b.
d)     The last digit on the right must match the last digit of the DEA number.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

What Nurses Make

"You're a nurse?? That's cool, I wanted to do that when I was a kid. What do you make?" "WHAT DO I MAKE??" I make holding your hand seem like the most important thing in the world when you're scared. I can make your child breathe when they stop. I can help your father survive a heart attack. I make myself get out of bed at 5am to make sure your mother has the medicine she needs to live. I work all day to save the lives of strangers. I make my family wait for dinner until I know your family member is taken care of. I make myself skip lunch so that I can make sure that everything I did for your husband today is charted. I make myself work weekends and holidays because people just don't get sick Monday thru Friday. Today, I might save your life. I MAKE A DIFFERENCE, what do you make?"

Thursday, September 29, 2011

African Business Ventures

Many of my clients are involved in international business ventures. This is a reminder that you don't have much time to attend. Check their website for more information and registration: www.africacncl.org.

Here is their press release:

2011 U.S. Africa Business Summit to
Showcase Huge Opportunities in Africa: Top African
and U.S. Business and Government Leaders to Participate

WASHINGTON – The African continent continues to show the world how to grow economically during one of the toughest global downturns in decades. To advance trade and investment flows globally into Africa, The Corporate Council on Africa (CCA) will convene the 8th Biennial U.S.-African Business Summit in Washington, D.C., Oct. 5-7, 2011. The Summit is the premier event for finding and building partnerships with more than 1,200 government and business leaders from the U.S. and Africa, as well as from Europe, Canada and Japan.

A packed three-day event, the Summit will include over 32 workshops and plenaries, a trade expo and “The Vault”, a match-making program connecting projects and entrepreneurs with sources of funding. These events will highlight Africa’s most promising sectors, including agribusiness, infrastructure, energy, health, power and security.

Featured speakers include Elizabeth Littlefield, President & CEO, Overseas Private Investment Corp (OPIC); Hanna Tetteh, Minister of Trade & Industry, Ghana; Joe Oteng-Adjei, Minister of Energy, Ghana; Hage Geingob, Minister of Trade & Industry, Namibia; Bart Nnaji, Minister of Power, Nigeria; Akin Adesina, Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Nigeria; Erastus Mwencha, Deputy Chairperson, African Union Commission, and Susan Mboya, Group Director Eurasia & Africa, Coca Cola.

The Corporate Council on Africa is hosting on Wed., Oct. 5, a special opening gala dinner. Burkina Electric will perform their eclectic mix, and Somi will entertain with their sultry sounds. A fusion of American and African culinary classics will be served. The Summit program will be kicked off by a keynote address by one of the most senior-ranking U.S. Administration officials.

Since its inception in 1997, in Chantilly, Va., the CCA U.S.-Africa Business Summit has brought together heads of state along with other government and business leaders to engage in dialogue on U.S. and Africa trade as well as economic and political relationships.

“The nations of Africa are experiencing one of the greatest booms in business in the history of the African continent, and the Summit showcases these investment opportunities,“ said Stephen Hayes, CCA’s President and CEO. “The future of Africa is tied to the level of investment going into Africa, the last great frontier in the world for new investment and development.”

Attendees can meet potential business partners and learn more about the Obama Administration’s policy on Africa as well as details on the continent’s important position in the global economy. Participants will have the opportunity to network with key African and U.S. private sector and government representatives, identify specific growth areas and hear detailed information about projects that are ripe for investment. Additionally, they will learn about the latest financing options and meet numerous high-ranking African ministers.

CCA also offers country-sponsored Doing Business Forums, which delve into the trade and investment opportunities offered by specific countries. They begin with Kenya on the evening of Oct. 4, and continue on Oct. 5 with Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Ethiopia and Ghana.

Despite the current global economic downturn, African countries continue to experience above average growth and higher levels of investment across a diverse portfolio of industries. The International Monetary Fund estimates that gross domestic product in the 47 countries of sub-Saharan Africa rose 5 percent last year and forecasts growth of 5.5 percent in 2011. Hayes noted that global investment is beginning to pour into parts of Africa in amounts unimagined a decade ago. “The Summit connects U.S. business leaders with African business leaders, resulting in substantial new investment.”

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton noted at the 2009 Summit, “Today the question for all of us who care about the future of Africa is: What can be done to sustain and deepen the democratic and economic transformation that is now underway?”

Thirty-two major corporations and media organizations have signed on as sponsors for this monumental event. They represent the vast majority of U.S. investment in Africa and also include some of the largest African corporations and institutions.

About The Corporate Council on Africa

Established in 1993, The Corporate Council on Africa is a nonpartisan 501 (c) (3) membership organization of nearly 180 U.S. companies dedicated to strengthening the commercial relationship between the U.S. and Africa. CCA members represent nearly 85 percent of total U.S. private sector investments in Africa. The organization is dedicated to bringing together potential business partners and to showcase business opportunities on the continent.

Friday, July 01, 2011

Legal Documentary

I highly recommend Hot Coffee, a documentary that recently premiered on HBO. Hot Coffee is almost painful but if you are interested in truth it begins and ends in this film. Watching this documentary will give a complete and accurate overview of the civil side of contemporary American law. We will have to await attorney Susan Saladoff—who produced and directed Hot Coffee—to do a sequel to give an overview of the criminal justice system. But for now, Hot Coffee is the only documentary or fictionalized movie I am aware of that comes close to an accurate portrayal of the real practice of law in America today—as opposed to 30 years ago.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Beyond the "War on Drugs"

As a veteran pharmacist and attorney, I have a different perspective on how to mitigate societal problems in the United States caused by addiction and trafficking in illegal drugs such as heroin and cocaine. My readers are sophisticated and already knowledgeable regarding issues of substance abuse and the history of efforts by law enforcement to abate the problem.

I will not waste the reader’s time cataloging the well-publicized social ills attributable to drug addiction. Nor is it necessary to remind the reader of the many positive contributions that law enforcement makes to society.

President Nixon declared a “war on drugs”, created the DEA and initiated a series of long criminal sentences for illegal drug sales and use. Wars–even metaphorical ones–are extremely expensive and our country has poured billions of dollars into building more and larger prisons, hiring more DEA agents, paying off foreign governments to try to reduce drug production, covert warfare, etc. This has been an expensive failure that arguably has created more problems than it has reduced. The “war” focuses on reducing the “supply” side of the “supply and demand equation”.

Right now a large part of Mexico is embroiled in a war between rival narcotic traffickers that threatens to spread northward into the U.S. Border agents have been caught taking bribes from traffickers. This is what we know about. Our expensive prison system is overwhelmed with inmates including a large number who are there for marijuana use. Soldiers and law enforcement officers have been injured and killed, innocent bystanders have died too.

When it became obvious that the “War on Drugs” was failing, the government doubled down by adding asset forfeiture (seizure of money and property of sellers and users of illegal drugs). It seemed sensible at the time. The rationale was that drug traffickers are willing to risk long prison terms and even execution, because trafficking in illegal drugs is so lucrative. If law enforcement could seize the money, cars, boats, houses, bank accounts, etc. of drug dealers and even simple drug users, U.S. law enforcement could finally “turn the tide in the war on drugs”. This approach of asset forfeiture has not only failed to stop drug addiction and illegal drug abuse but actually has corrupted law enforcement and harmed our society. Why?

Presently, police officers observe drug dealers for sometimes years before swooping down to seize millions of dollars in assets accumulated by the drug dealer. All the while the drug dealer is operating, customers are overdosing, there is domestic violence in families and the other ills attributable to illegal drug abuse. Why wait years or even months? One could say it is to gather sufficient evidence to make an iron clad case but that might be naïve. Since law enforcement keeps 80% to 100% of the assets seized for themselves, a reasonable person might question their motivation. The reader can just Google “policing for profit”, “drug asset forfeiture abuses” and search the net and local newspapers for many stories of innocent persons being injured and killed during drug raids.

A more insidious problem with asset forfeiture is that the police have large amounts of money, a part of which is used to buy ever more lethal firearms, tanks, stun guns, grenades, flash bangs, black ninja suits and balaclava masks, helmets, helicopters and whatever else a salesman can persuade police officers is a cool thing to have in their arsenal. I submit that the very fact that police officers possess such excessive equipment makes it much more likely that police and citizens will be severely injured or killed accidentally. And just seeing the police rolling with a tank through a neighborhood with ski masks and black outfits is an affront to a civilized society.

Google this recent true story of actor Steven Seagal and publicity hound, Maricopa County Sheriff Arpaio using a tank in a residential neighborhood to knock down a garage, killing 50 chickens because they were executing a search warrant for suspected illegal chicken fighting! And yes, this was all filmed and will appear in Steven Seagal’s “Lawman” show! You can’t make up stuff this absurd. This excessive raid frightened citizens and the rumbling tanks broke home windows! The articles mention the frightened responses of neighbors living in this quiet neighborhood. Afterwards, the people in the neighborhood were shocked, outraged and ridiculed the police. Such heavy-handed tactics do not garner respect for government or law enforcement, but rather inspire fear, followed by resentment.

My approach to reducing illegal drug abuse/addiction

The smartest way to reduce drug trafficking and the societal ills caused by illegal drug abuse and addiction is to reduce demand for the product. Enlightened police officers, citizens and health professionals who work with drug addicts are uniform in recognizing that drug abuse/addiction is a medical problem that requires extensive and expensive medical treatment to rehabilitate the abuser/addict.

Prisons do not work for addicts without a real drug treatment program. Not only do people continue to use illegal drugs in the prison but turn right back to the same drugs or worse drugs when they are released. It is extremely expensive to incarcerate drug abusers. But most of you already know this, so what am I saying that is new? Read on.

Where a person’s only crime is use of marijuana, that person should not be incarcerated but should instead be directed for treatment and if punishment is required, community service and fines are more cost effective. With regard to dangerous hard drugs such as heroin, cocaine, methamphetamines, etc. then intense, effective medical treatment is mandatory.

The problem is the people who need treatment the most, do not have the money to pay for the needed treatment. My idea is to amend the existing asset forfeiture and seizure laws to take almost all of the proceeds seized to pay for real substance abuse and addiction treatment. Law enforcement should only receive the actual costs of arrests. In no event, should any individual members of law enforcement receive money or bonuses from the asset forfeiture.

Here is why my suggested amendment makes sense for society:

· The money taken from drug traffickers and users will be used to pay for medical treatment for addicts.

· Police will not have a financial incentive or motive to abuse asset forfeiture laws for their own personal or departmental financial gains.

· Law enforcement will be freed up to pursue other criminals, in particular, financial swindles that have cost the American public so dearly.

· As the number of abusers and addicts are reduced through effective medical treatment, the demand for the illegal drugs will be reduced and reduce the power and violence of narcotic traffickers.

· The number of people incarcerated and the expense to the taxpayers will be greatly reduced and there will be space for Wall Street swindlers to occupy in prison.

· Law enforcement officers and special op soldiers will have less need to put their lives in danger facing narcotic traffickers in foreign countries and at home.

· The reduction in the military style raids in neighborhoods will reduce accidental injuries and deaths to innocent bystanders as well as to repair the image of American law enforcement. No people in any country in the world has respect or loyalty to a regime where its police act violently and aggressively to its own citizens.

In summary, the law of supply and demand is primal. Since we cannot reduce the supply of illegal drugs we should try to reduce the demand.